Mr. LAWRENCE, of Ohio, also, from the ComJudiciary, reported back bill of the House No. 606, to amend an act to establish the judicial courts of the U.S., approved September 24, 1789. he bill was read. The 1st section provides that the several courts of the U.S., and the several justices and judges of such courts in addition to the authority already conferred by law, 'shall have power to grant writsof habeascorpus in all cases where any person may be restrained of his or her liberty in violation of the Constitution, or of an treaty or law of the U.S. And i any person or persons to whom such writ of habeascorpus may be directed shall refuse to obey the same, or shall neglect or refuse to make return, or shall make a false return thereto, in addition to the remedies alrcady given by law, he or they shall be deemed and taken to be guilty of a misde meanor, and shall, on conviction before any court of competent jurisdiction, be punished by fine notexceeding $1,000, and by imprisonment not exceeding one year, or by either, according to the nature and aggravation of the case. From the final decision of any judge, justice, or court, inferior to the circuit court, an appeal may be taken to the circuit court of the U.S. for the district in which said cause is heard, and from the judgment of said circuit courtto the SCOTUS on such terms and under such regulations an orders, as well for the custody and appearance of the person alleged to be restrained of his or her liberty as for sending up to the appellate tribunal a transcript of the petition, writ of habeascorpus, return thereto, and other proceedings, as may be prescribed by the Supreme Court, or in default of such, as the judge hearing said cause may prescribe, and pending such proceedings or appeal, and until final judgment e rendered therein, and after final judgment of discharge in the same, and against such person so alleged to beprreosetereadiuineg of his or her liberty in any State court, or by or under the authority of on State, for any matter or thing so heard and ( ctermined, or in process of bein heard and determined, under and by virtue 0 such writ of habeascorpus, shall be deemed null and void. The 2nd section provides that a final judgment or decree in an suit in the highest court of a State in which a decision in the suit could be had, where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of, or an authority exercised under, the U.S and the decision is against their validity, or where is drawn in question the validity of a statute of, or an authority exercised under any State, on the ground of their being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the U.S., and the decision is in favor of such their validity, or where any title, riglR, privilege, or immunity is claimed under the constitution, or any treaty or statutp of, or commission held or authority exercised under {he U.S., and the decision is against the title, right, privilege, or immunity specially set up or claimed by either party under such constitution, treaty, statute, commission, or authority, may be re'exainined and reversed or affirmed in the SCOTUS, upon a writ of error, the citation being ashburn, siflned by the chief justice, or judge, or chan ce lor of the court, rendering or passing the judgment or decree complained of, or by a justice of the SCOTUS, in the same manner, and under the same regulations, and the writ shall have the same effect as if the judgment or decree complained of had been rendered or passed in a court of the U.S.; and the proceeding upon the reversal shall also be the same, except that the Supreme Court may, at their discretion, proceed to a final decision of the same, and award execution, or remand the same to any inferior court. The committee reported the following amendment: Amend section one by iriserting after;the words "U.S."in line 8, the folloiving: ofAnd llBllllIfbG lawful for such personso restrained his or her liberty to up ly toeither ofsaid Justices or judges for a writ of habeascorpus which application shall bein writing andverifiedby affidavit and shall setforth the facts concernin the detention of tthuernpeadr, taynadpplyipg. in whosecusto g v1rt uo owfhat clpimor authority. if known, and the said justice or judge to whomsuch application shall be made shall forthwith award a writ of habeuscorpus unlessit shall a pear from the petition itself that the party is not cprived of his or her liberty in contravention of the constitution or laws of the cum States. Saidwrit shall be directed to the person in whose custody the party is detained. who shall make return of said writ and brin the party before the judge who granted the writ an certify the true cause of the etention of such person within 3 days thereafter.unless such person be detained beyond the distanceof 20 miles and if beyond the distanceof 20 inilesand not above 100 miles. then within ten days. And if beyond the distance of 100 miles then with in 20 days. And is on the return of the writ of habemcorpusa day ahal be set for the hearing of the cause.not exceeding 5 daysthereafter, unlessthe party petitioning shall request a longer.time. The petitioner may deny any of the material facts set orth in the return, or may allege any fact to show that the detentionis in contraventionpf the Constitution ‘or laws of the U.S., which allegations or denials shall be madeon oath. The said return may be amendedby leaveof the court or judge be foropr after the same is filed. asalso may all sug cations made against it. that therebythe material acts may be ascertained. The said court or judge shall proceed in a summary way to determine the factsof the case.by hearing testimony and the argu mentsof the parties interested.andifit shall appear that the petitioneris deprivedof his or her liberty in contravention of the constitution or laws of the U.S., he or she shall forthwith be discharged and setat liberty. The committee further proposed to amend the 2nd section of the bill by adding thereto the followtng: This act shall not apply to the caseof any person who is or maybe he] in the custodyof the military authorities of the U.S. charged with any military offense or ivith having aided or abetted rebellion against the Govorpmentof the U.S. prior to e passage of this act. '