Mr. MCDOUGALL. Mr. President, it is not often that I have so much occasion to differ with my friendfrom Wisconsin, [Mr. DOOI.ITT1.E] but on this subject we differ radically. The Holy Alliance was an effort of which the present movement in Europe is the counterpart. The movement of France in Mexico is a counter art of the movement upon Valparaiso and Cal:10. With this matter, perhaps, the Senfrom Wisconsin may not be conversant. There is a determination on the part of certain forces in Europe to subjugate Spanish America, and, among other possessions, the State wherein I inhabit. I had occasion to say this in the senate before. Louis Napoleon, in the opening of the war, pretended that he only wanted to demand a small amount of money, and he invited the U.S and Spain and England to join him. They all agreed to do so except our own Government. Our Government refused. The fleets of the 3 other States came into the Gulf of Mexico; but the English and Spanish fleets withdrew and returned to their own countries. Louis Napo leon wrote to General Forey, who was his commander in chief at that time: “My policy is to circumscribe the great republic of North America. They are growing too large and too powerful, and I want to throw a force in that will limit their extension.” That was the substance. The letter I read on this floor before. The policy of Louis Napoleon has been one of extreme hostility to the Republic of the U.S. The republican sentiment of France is with the U.S. He has undertaken to establish an aristocratic sentiment, and for that reason he placed Maximilian, who was related to the iron crown of Charlemagne, in Mexico, making a worse mistake than he who is called his uncle did when he disavowed his true wife and married Marie Therese. Louis Napoleon is the worst enemy that the republican people of the U.S and of the world have, seeking to ally himself by strength with aristocracy. He started as a.republican 1st; he became a Carbonari, known as such throughout Italy; then, not being able to maintain himself as a Carbonari, because his wife, a Spanish woman, was an intense devotee of the Roman church, and as the high bishops and high churchmen of France rebelled he had to change his base; he became then, instead of“ new Italy, ” for “ old Italy.” Once he supported Victor Emmanuel in order to make a young Ital. Now he dare not lay his word in favor of enetin. There are great underlying questions in this very proposition, and the american people have no business to recognize him in any form of power. This amendment is to recognize him as one of stihmeply doewcleinrsin o Europe with our consent. If we want to compliment our worst enemy, the resolution is well; if we want to ignore our worst enemy, then otherwise. I think, with all the carefulness I can bestow upon the thought, that he is the worst enemy we have and the worst enemy of free institutions. He is a false man. He proved it by taming Carbonari and undertaking to maintain republican institutions when he had no such intention. He went to Paris after he was permitted to return and was elected t“o a place in the Chambers. He then raised the Napoleon" cry, which has been a popular cry in France as we all know, and he made' a coup d’ctat, he became 1st President and then emperor. His intention from the 1st was to be mperor. He hunted u the conclusion in the castle at Ham when he pay there in rison. He is probably the worst man in the world, and certainly the worst enemy of true republican institutions. Now, I am with the Senfrom Iowa. I would like to send some gentlemen to this Exhibition at Paris. I would rather pay them out of my private ursc, if I had the money, than pa any comp iment to this Emperor. I do hol, and I think that our country should hold, that he is the worst enem of our country that there is now extant. e has said in his public letters that his policy is to circum scribe this republic.