Mr. MCDOUGALL. That is aprinted book from which the Senator reads those figures; and if I believed all the printed books I ever saw I should be confused with 10,000 lies. “Confusion worse confounded, ” as Mil ton said, would be nothing to it. [can perhaps illustrate how such things are made up. It was supposed when I came to the Senate hall that I would naturally hate a Republican, a Black Republican, as he was then called. I was a plied to if I did not think so and so of a certain man. I inquired the cause for the question, and I was told that I was wanted before the committee on the conduct of the war. My opinion about such and such personsI knew them wellI was free to give there, but I am not subject to questioning here in the Hall. I answered the committee. I did not want to know anything more about it. I felt that it seemed to be assumed that because the person who was challenged was a Republican, would swear that he was a damned rascal! Excuse the “damn.” That is the way these papers and these books and thee statistics that are furnished here are made up, and I take this occasion to say that from the way the are made up they are not worth a farthing. care not to discuss this question, for I have in own exacto inions; and regard itasmyduty, having been c othed with the office of a Senator, to express my opinions. This bill in all its qualities, I think, is fraught with mischief, but I v will not go into that now. I had occasion to say it once before; I take occasion to repeat it now. It is notmischievous to the South alone; it is not mischievous to any particular part of the country; it is mischievous to all who hope that we may at some future day see this Republic reintegrated. There is no one here in this Hall who has a right proper to be here as a councilor of the nation that does not seek to see us reinte rated and once again a common people.al this kind of legislation tends to disintegration as against integration. I cannot add to what has been said by the Senfrom Kentucky:1single word, because he has is oken from his heart and I speak from my hea, for I come from the far western coast where the question of negro or non-negro has no interest to my people; and yet as an American citizen, born in this country and thinking that I belong to every part of this re)ub lic, from its extremest east to west and rum north to south, I feel that I have a deep and abiding interest in the integrit of the whole Union for in self and those wfio shall come after me and who may call themselves by m name. I say that all these angry things which promote controversy and avoid exactly avoid directly, avoid ur osely, conciliation, are full of infinite mischief. I would not be here but that I feel it my duty to resist with what little strength I may possess all this disposition on the part of the ortheast, if you please, and of those who inherit northeastern opinions. to compel and conquer love, a thing impossible, and the strangest paradox that could be named in thouivht. Can we be one unless we agree to be one" Can we be one without conciliation? Napoleon said that when he had conquered victory. Frenchmen were friends of the vanquished, enemies no longer; and that is the true law of all high, civilized races. There seems to be a disposition to trample down and destroy and trend in the dust all those who have been our adversaries. Now, I say after they are down, I want to give them my right hand and lift them up. They shall be myequals and eers again, and those who do not sa thus are ise to their high office in Senate all or in council chamber.