The SPEAKER. The Chair is of opinion that the gentleman has the right to object to its introduction, when the question of granting leave must be acted on without debate. The Clerk will report the bill, after which, if there is objection, the question will be taken upon granting leave for its introduction and reference at this time. The bill was read at length. The 1st section provides that in any suit or prosecution, civil or criminal, which has beenor shall be cemmenced in any State court, against any officer, civil or military, or against any other person for any arrest or imprisonment made, or any other trespass done or committed, during the time of the rebellion, the defendant may file a petition to remove the cause for trial in the U.S. Court of Claims; and upon utlidavit that the arrest, imprisonment, or tres pass was made or committed by him asifin officer of the U.S. in pursuance of orders from his superior officer which he. was bound to obey, and ata time when the rebel forces had invaded or were about to invade the place where the arrest was made, and that he had cause to believe that the person or persons ar rested if left at large won d impede the operation of the U.S. forces, and that the arrest was rerted to his superior officer, who approved an sanctioned the arrest, and the party arrested was received from his hands by officers of the U.S., and held by them with the knowledge and approval of the SecyWar and the POTUS as he believes, it shall be the duty of the State court to proceed no further in the cause, but to dismiss the same and strike it from the docket, and make proor orders for its transfer and removal to the I U.S. Court of Claims, where the cause shall be filed and disposed of as are other claims against the U.S.; and upon the plaintilf showing undoubted loyalty, and that his arrest and imprisonment was made without reasonable or proper eause, the court shall assess an amount in damages in his favor which shall be paid as other claims out of the Treasury of the U.S. Section 2 provides that it shall be lawful in any such suit or prosecution for either party to more the transfer of the same by zipea or writ of error to the circuit court of the U.S and thence to the SCOTUS, whenever the State court shall have decided the motion for the removal of the cause for trial, as prescribed in the 1st section. Section 3 provides that upon the filing of a copy of the record mode in t 10State court in the suit or prosecution described in this not down to and inclusive of the judgment of the court upon the motion for removal, it shall be the duty of the U.S. circuit court to cause the removal or transfer of the suitor prose cution. with all the papers connected therewith, by mandamus or such 1 other order as may be necessary to effect the removal aforesaid. Section 4 provides that in all cases where judgment has been obtained against any party described in the 1st section, upon the party filing a record of the act upon which the judgment was obtained, with an allidavit setting forth the facts as herein provided, in the circuit court of the U.S., it shall be the duty of the circuit court, by supersedem or such other order as may be necessary, to stay all proceedings which may be commenced or authorized to be commenced by reason of any judgment in the State court; and any officer of any State court who shall refuse to obey or comply with any order from the U.S. court shall be subject to a penalty of a fine of not less than $500 nor more than $5,000, or imprisonment not more than 3 years, or both, in the discretion of the court, the proceedings against the officer disregarding the order who held in the court from which the order may issue.