Mr. Fuller is entitled to free of all doubt. I have shown this House, I think, that these 24 votes should have been counted for the contestant in this case. But I have more here of the same kind. Take Satterlee hospital. It is proved that of 6 votes cast there 6 were cast for Fuller and 1 for Dawson; that will give Fuller 29 majority. Yet notwithstanding the evidence of the votes cast in these hospitals where the ma'ority was largely in favor of the contestant an against the sit ting member, making the majority 01 the contestant 29, we have here 3 members of the Republican party declaring to the world that the law of Pennsylvania is to be trampled under foot and the soldiers of that State are to be disfranchised. Now, will this House do this injustice to those soldiers after they had done so much for the country? I would like to see gentlemen go into their districts and defend themselves when they will throw out soldiers’ votes because there has been some informality. But, sir, there has been no infor mality in one case that has not existed in the other. I think the facts will prove incontest ably that my declaration is true. Mr. Speaker, one word more and I will close. I know how hard it is to meet the report of the ComElections or any other commit tee. I can call to mind several cases where the House by an overwhelming vote has refused to pass a bill reported by the committee. may refer to the case of a bill reported by the chairman of the ComMilAffrs, one of the ablest members of the House, which was rejected by the House. It is no disrespect to the ComElections when I say that 4 members of that committee, equal in in telligence, equal in discrimination to those of the majority, refused to sign the report. I know how members upon this floor have been button holed to go for the sitting member in this case. I know how personal appeals have been made to stand by the sitting member. have noticed it, and whether honorable or not, I leave it to the friends of the sitting member to determine.