Mr. COWAN. The honorable Senator will find the wing this fall, and it will be such a wing as will sweep him and his faction out of existence, or I am veg much mistaken in the signs of the times. e may succeed, up in Massachusetts, or along there, but he will not succeed anywhere else, I think, very well, with all the bluster and parade that he makes as though he and his set were the whole Republican party. The Senator today has dese ended into matters which more properly beIOng to the executive sessions of this body. He has chared the President here with what, pray? A e sign to betra the republican party? [Mr. WILSON shook his head.] To betra was the word; and I speak it knowing what do speak and understanding what I do say, and I speak it more in sorrow than in anger, that in this party of ours for some time it has been the FBSllIOYl.when anybody differed from certain gentlemen upon this side, there was no tolerance of a difference of opinion; there was no term too harsh to be aplied to the recusant. Any man of sense could have seen that that was a very handsome way to keep up a party, particularly when that party had its platforms romulged to the world; when they were written, own and before the world, and could be read and when the people themselves had pronounced upon them. Now I say to the honorable Senfrom Massachusetts and all those who hold similar opinions with him I trust there are not many who will be so unguarded in their language as he has been that so far from the President betraying the Republican party, if its written records are to be evidence of what it believes and what it thinks, the President to da stands upon its platform firmly. Take that p atform, produce your articles, bring forward your resolutions, and show where he has violated a single one of them; and when you do Iwill undertake to show upon this floor, and I will show it beyond the possibility of a denial, that it is the honorable Senator, and those who believe with him, who never were members of the party, who never ought to have belonged to it, and were the burden that it has always carried; that they are those who caused the divervence; they are those who, carried away into these new schemes and these new projects, have split it and divided it. I understand the Senator belongs to a party who diseard plat forms, who diseard the belief of yesterday a party of progress, who boast, “Are we not wiser today than we were yesterday? Have we not learned something in the e. erience tfii the past?” I should he glad ift ey had. ow