Mr. LAWRENCE, of Pennsylvania. I will now refer to a scene which has come up vividly before my mind since my friendfrom Illinois [Mr. Isesasota] commenced his speech a scene which occurred 3 years ago or more in the Senate of Pennsylvania when I heard AndrewJohnson slandered and vilified more than I ever heard any man abused in a public body by that sameHeister Clymer and his Democratic associates. I have the speech here. I was told that the Senator was careful to suppress some parts of it, but in that speech he assailed AndrewJohnson in the strongest terms, declaring him utterly unworthy of the confidence of the Democratic party and why was it that he made that assault on AndrewJohnson? Because we were disposed to honor him by giving him the use of the hall of the Senate of our State in which he could be heard tn defense of the war. The Democratic party refused to vote for it; they would not even permit his voice to be heard in that hall in favor of the cause of his country. A motion was 1st made in the House that AndrewJohnson, and Governor Wright, of Indiana, should have the use of the hall of the House in that dark hour of the country, and how was that motion met by the representatives of the great Democratic party, who are now, or claim to be, the specia friends of the President? It was defeated by their votes, and then presented in the Senate. I have no disposition to join in any vituperation against the President. I am far from indorsing some of the utterances of my friendfrom Illinois [Mr. Isosasouiin his speech today in regard to Andrew Jo uson shall never engage in any personal abuse of any man who maybe Opposed to the policy of the party with which I act. But, sir, I say that this same Democratic party, led on by this same Heister Clymer in Pennsylvania, were opposed to allowin AndrewJohnson an opportunity to be hear in the hall of the Senate of Pennsylvania, and that the very same leaders have been here in this ca ital, and I have met them in the presence of the pOTUS, asking, as Isnppose, for his interference in the State in favor of their party. These very men abused him 2 ears ago as I never heard a public man abuse in a public assembly, asI had occasion to know, for I was in the chairat the time, and was compelled several times to call them to order on account of their low abuse of a man that I supposed then to be, and still hope that I may be permitted to call, a strict. [ ere Mr. wARNEB auded Mr. Lawnsxcs the speech referred to.]